From 9/11 To The White House | This Week In GeoPolitics | #BitcoinHardTalk Ep.106 (Part 3)

bitcoin hard talk geopolitics Nov 14, 2025

Introduction: Unplugging from the Matrix

Hey hey Bitcoin Wealth Builders,

How does the former head of Al-Qaeda in Syria end up meeting with a former US President in Washington and giving interviews on Fox News?

The media presents world events as disconnected, chaotic crises—wars, terror attacks, and financial meltdowns. But what if they are all connected, part of a script designed to benefit a hidden power structure that operates above nations and ideologies?

This article is a summary—a TLDR—of the key geopolitical takeaways from Part 3 of BitcoinHardTalk, Episode 106. The full episode is a 1-hour and 42-minute deep dive. If you prefer to read, this post provides the essential framework. For the complete context, however, we strongly encourage you to watch the full video, along with the accompanying TLDR and Whiteboard Explainer videos. The central theme is simple but profound: to truly understand the world, you must "follow the money" and identify the real sovereign power, which I call the "Proof of Weapons Network."

The 5 Counter-Intuitive Truths About Modern Geopolitics

1. The Real Power Isn't a Country; It's a Network

The common narrative suggests nations like the US are the primary actors on the world stage. The reality is that the ultimate sovereign power is not a country but a network. This "Proof of Weapons Network" is the true global authority: a formidable alliance of the military-industrial complex (MIC), the financial-industrial complex (FIC), and Big Tech, managed by massive asset managers like BlackRock.

In this model, nations are used as brands and their populations as collateral. Countries like Israel are not the ultimate power but function as "covert colonies" for the network, providing plausible deniability. This allows the network to execute its agenda—from black operations to genocide—without its core components having their fingerprints directly on it, shielding them from accountability.

Israel actually operates more like a colony of the United States serving a deep state and the reason for this setup plausible deniability it lets the US get things done without officially having its fingerprints on it.

This reframes patriotism from a civic virtue into a potential marketing tool, and national identity into a brand used for plausible deniability.

Understanding that this network, not a nation, is in charge is the key to decoding its recent maneuvers. What appeared to be the start of World War III, for example, was merely the network shifting its business model.

2. Recent "Wars" Were Actually Financial Deals in Disguise

When the Iran-Israel conflict flared up, headlines screamed about the brink of World War III. An analysis of the markets and military actions, however, revealed it was not a real war but "geopolitical theater." This "12-Day War" was a pre-scripted play, a negotiation disguised as a conflict.

The real goal was not military victory but a global financial reset. The old model that served the Military-Industrial Complex (think Lockheed Martin, Raytheon) by profiting from "forever wars" is being replaced. The new model serves the Financial-Industrial Complex (think BlackRock, JP Morgan) by profiting from "rebuilding and investing" in those same regions. The conflict was carefully managed to strategically weaken state and corporate assets, making them ripe for acquisition.

I mean think about that the idea is that this whole 12-day event wasn't real it was a performance right a pre-scripted play a negotiation that was just disguised as a conflict and it was all designed to hit a very specific goal that had nothing to do with fighting.

The implication is staggering: the wars that dominate our headlines may not be about victory or ideology, but about preparing assets for a corporate takeover, with human lives as collateral.

🇮🇷 🇮🇱 🇺🇸 The Play-by-Play Theatre of the Iran, Israel & US War | This Week in GeoPolitics (Part 3) | #BitcoinHardTalk Episode 87

This model of profiting from "rebuilding" requires new partners on the ground. This economic imperative explains the most shocking development of all: the rebranding of designated terrorists into legitimate statesmen.

3. Yesterday's "Terrorist" is Today's Dinner Guest

Nothing illustrates this shift more clearly than the case of Abu Muhammad Al-Galani. As the former head of Al-Qaeda and ISIS in Syria, he was one of America's most wanted men. Recently, he was in Washington meeting with Donald Trump and being interviewed on Fox News.

Dixon's analysis reveals this meeting as a legitimization ritual. Trump, acting as an agent for the financial-industrial complex, signals to the world that Al-Galani is now open for business. The FIC is preparing to secure investment deals for rebuilding Syria, and Al-Galani is a key figure who can deliver stability on the ground. He has transitioned from a tool of the MIC (creating chaos) to a tool of the FIC (enabling investment). The "terrorist" label is not a moral designation but a flexible tool applied to state-sponsored mercenaries, who are embraced as soon as they become profitable in a new way.

Those who orchestrated 9/11 um those that benefited from a widespread marketing campaign of terrorism are the exact same group that are now benefiting from embracing the quote unquote terrorists now because they created them.

This proves that in the calculus of the network, there are no permanent enemies, only permanent interests—and a "terrorist" is simply an asset whose function has changed from demolition to construction.

This rehabilitation isn't happening in a vacuum. It's being forced by a massive, irreversible shift in global economic power.

4. The World Order is Resetting—And China is Holding the Purse Strings

The era of singular US dominance is over. We are in a multipolar world, and the key driver is economic. China is now the largest customer for Middle Eastern oil, and its primary interest is regional stability to protect its investments and energy supplies.

This economic reality is forcing new diplomatic arrangements, like the China-brokered normalization between arch-rivals Iran and Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries are using their massive sovereign wealth—derived primarily from selling oil to China—to buy up key strategic assets in the US and the region. The source is explicit: "the revenue that they're using to invest in America is via proxy from China." This "reverse colonization" marks a definitive pivot away from the petrodollar system and signifies a historic transfer of financial power.

What we are witnessing is not just a change in alliances, but a change in the ownership structure of the world, financed by the East and brokered by Wall Street.

This new world order marks the end of an era—an era that was launched by a single, manufactured event designed to give the Proof of Weapons Network a blank check for two decades.

5. 9/11 Wasn't an Intelligence Failure; It Was a Pre-Planned Launch Event

The official story of 9/11 is that of a shocking, unforeseen attack. The evidence reveals a different story entirely: 9/11 was the manufactured pretext required to launch a pre-existing agenda.

Shortly after the attacks, General Wesley Clark revealed he was shown a Pentagon memo laying out a plan to "take out seven countries in 5 years": Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finally, Iran. This campaign was planned long before the towers fell. 9/11 was simply the necessary "new Pearl Harbor" to sell the plan to the American public. The evidence points to a multinational intelligence nexus involving elements from US (CIA), Saudi, and Israeli (Mossad) intelligence actively facilitating the event. This cooperation has a deep history through off-the-books structures like the "Safari Club" and the money-laundering bank "BCCI."

in fact what was 9/11 nothing to do with people being jealous of your freedom it was actually a hugely profitable operation for the US proof of weapons network and the private sector and the very stocks that you're buying.

The horrifying truth is that the "War on Terror" was not a reaction to a tragedy; the tragedy was a required launch event for the war.

Your Next Move: Watch, Read, and Understand

This summary only scratches the surface. To grasp the full depth of this analysis and see the evidence for yourself, you must go deeper.

Watch the full episode: We strongly encourage you to watch the complete 1-hour and 42-minute video of BitcoinHardTalk Episode 106, Part 3.
Read the source material: Read my post "From 9/11 to the White House...". It contains links to the 4-hour Ryan Dawson documentary that lays out what is described as irrefutable proof of this hidden history.

From 9/11 To The White House | #BitcoinHardTalk Ep.106 (Part 3) (Duration: 1 hour 42 minutes)

From 9/11 to the White House: When the Ex-Al-Qaeda Boss Becomes Syria’s President and Dines with Trump

Boycotting a system you don't understand is impossible. The only vote that truly matters is your financial vote. The first step is to see the game for what it is.

Conclusion: Are You Watching a War or a Business Deal?

The central thesis is that much of what we see on the world stage is theater—an elaborate, and often violent, performance created by the Proof of Weapons Network to manage perceptions and extract wealth. The actors and scripts change, but the objective remains the same. The real conflict is not between nations or religions, but between this network of control and the forces of individual sovereignty.

Now that you've been shown how you may have been lied to, how will you make sense of what's happening in the world today?

Peace!

Simon Dixon🚀
Bitcoin OG | Investor | Geo-Political & Financial Analyst

Disclaimer

The content provided in this blog post is for informational and educational purposes only and is based on the analysis presented in the Bitcoin Hard Talk episode mentioned. It should not be construed as financial, investment, or political advice. The views and opinions expressed are those of the original source. Readers are advised to conduct their own research and consult with professional advisors before making any decisions.