🇮🇷🇮🇱🇺🇸The Play-by-Play Theatre of the Iran, Israel & US War | This Week in GeoPolitics (Part 3) | #BitcoinHardTalk Episode 87

Jun 27, 2025

Don't have time to watch the full video?

Watch the TLDR Ai Summary (Duration: 39 minutes)

Watch the TLDR Whiteboard Explainer Video (Duration: 8 minutes)

Hey hey Bitcoin Wealth Builders!

Just a few weeks ago, the world was on edge, bracing for what headlines screamed was the beginning of World War III. The escalation between Iran and Israel had everyone convinced that a massive, devastating conflict was inevitable. But if you were following the financial flows instead of the fear-mongering media like I was and reporting on during x spaces live, you would have seen a completely different story unfold.

In my opinion what we witnessed was not a genuine war. It was a pre-scripted, meticulously choreographed piece of "geopolitical theatre." The entire 12-day affair was an agreed-upon negotiation disguised as a conflict, designed to facilitate a massive shift in global financial power. By following the money, we can see that the real players were not just nations, but the corporate interests that control them.

This post breaks down the six most impactful takeaways from this analysis, revealing the true objectives behind the smoke and mirrors.

This article is a summary of Part 3 of BitcoinHardTalk Episode 87. For a complete, in-depth analysis, you can watch the full video: "The Play-by-Play Theatre of the Iran, Israel & US War | This Week In GeoPolitics."

The Surprising Truths Behind the Headlines

In my opinion, here is what was really going on behind the scenes while the world held its breath.

1. The Biggest Misconception: Israel Isn't in Control—It's a US Colony

The common narrative suggests that Israel exerts powerful control over US foreign policy. The financial analysis, however, reveals the opposite is true. Israel operates as a colony of the United States, serving the interests of a "deep state" or what can be called the "proof of weapons network." This network is a powerful alliance of the military-industrial complex, the financial-industrial complex, and big tech, collectively managed by major asset managers like BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard.

This colonial relationship provides the United States with perfect plausible deniability for its most controversial actions, allowing it to outsource operations like Palantir's beta testing of "genocide as a service" and "occupation as a service." These are then used to prop up the dollar debt-based Ponzi scheme while the deep state can always say, "It wasn't us, it was Israel." Understanding this hierarchy is crucial to reframing global power dynamics and seeing who truly profits.

"...Israel does not control America israel is a colony of America america is controlled by the deep state and the proof of weapons network..."

2. The "War" Was a Pre-Scripted Play with a 5-Act Structure

In my opinion the entire 12-day escalation and de-escalation was not a chaotic series of attacks and counter-attacks; it was a scripted negotiation playing out as geopolitical theatre. This pre-agreed performance followed a clear five-act structure, designed to achieve specific outcomes while giving each party a "victory" to sell to its domestic audience.

Act 1: Israel executes a scripted bombing of an Iranian target. The strategic intent was to eliminate IRGC hardliners who would never have agreed to the new regional vision being negotiated.
Act 2: Iran carries out its own scripted bombing of Israel. The goal here was not to cause mass casualties, but to strategically weaken key assets for a future corporate takeover.
Act 3: The US performs a theatrical bombing of evacuated Iranian nuclear sites, allowing it to claim it neutralized a major threat that never truly existed.
Act 4: Iran launches a pre-warned "retaliation" against a US military base, giving advance notice to ensure minimal damage and maintain credibility without true escalation.
Act 5: All three parties—the US, Israel, and Iran—simultaneously declare a triumphant victory to their people, ending the "crisis."

This theatrical framework is why I was able to predict the events unfolding live on x whilst others were panicking that the US was about to go to war with Iran leading to World War 3 as they were following the media noise whilst I was "following the money."

3. The Real Goal: A Global Financial Reset, Not Regional War

The true objective behind this theatre was not regional war but a global financial reset. We are witnessing a strategic pivot from the military-industrial complex to the financial-industrial complex. Military profits are being shifted to Europe through massive NATO budget increases.

Simultaneously, financial powers like BlackRock are moving in to invest in a decolonizing Middle East—a deal brokered by China (normalizing Iran-Saudi relations) and backed by BRICS, which gave the GCC the leverage to negotiate this exit from the US military.

This performance was necessary to create the conditions for a "reset of the world order to a growth phase based upon peace in the Middle East and decolonization."

The old model of profiting from "forever wars" in the Middle East is being replaced by a new model of profiting from rebuilding and investment.

"...the military-industrial complex would stop making profit from war and the financial industrial complex could reinvest in the region by partnering with GCC and Saudi Arabia..."

4. Israel Was Strategically Weakened for a Corporate Takeover

Iran's attacks were not random acts of aggression. They were targeted, agreed-upon strikes designed to weaken key Israeli assets for a future strategic takeover. This process of "vassalization" prepares the Israeli economy to be acquired by the financial industrial complex and its partners in the GCC. To manage the narrative, there was a media blackout in Israel, with reports of arrests for anyone who covered what was really happening.

The targets were chosen with surgical precision to cripple Israel's economic and military independence:

Military: Key command centers like the Al-Jalil northern command and the Nevatim airbase, where F-35s were grounded.
Energy: The Haifa refinery and a dual power plant were struck, causing blackouts and paralyzing the national grid.
Tech & Research: Intel's $10 billion chip fabs and the prestigious Weizmann Institute were targeted, exposing the vulnerability of Israel's innovation economy.
Logistics: The Haifa port and Ben Gurion Airport were shut down, halting critical supply chains.

This strategic weakening was immediately followed by the announcement of an Israeli "Build Back Better" urban renewal plan, which acts as a mechanism for a state-led land grab to prepare for this corporate and economic transition.

5. The Astonishing Opportunity Cost: Over 240,000 Bitcoin Vaporized

For fun, I calculated the cost of the 12-day war to Israel and the U.S. in Bitcoin terms. It’ll be interesting to track how much that same Bitcoin would have been worth in the future if it hadn’t been spent on war.

The financial cost of this 12-day theatre illustrates the insane math of modern warfare. In one night, Israel fired Arrow interceptors worth 28.3 Bitcoin each to stop Iranian missiles worth 18.9 Bitcoin each.

The US contribution, "Operation Midnight Hammer," involved a single stealth bomber run that cost 9,442 Bitcoin.

The total value destroyed over 12 days was $25.5 billion, equivalent to 240,837 Bitcoin. This represents more than 1% of all Bitcoin that will ever exist, vaporized in less than two weeks.

This perfectly illustrates the contrast between two systems: the "violent proof of weapons network," which funds destruction by printing fiat currency, and the "peaceful proof of work" of the Bitcoin network, which incentivizes creation and security. Ultimately, the cost of this destructive theatre is passed on to ordinary citizens to steal your wealth through the inflation required to pay for it.

6. Trump's True Role: Agent of the Financial Reset

Contrary to the popular narrative of Donald Trump as an anti-establishment outsider, my analysis presents him as a key agent of the financial-industrial complex. He was installed to implement the tariff policies that were necessary to kickstart this global reset. Those policies reset the world order in a way that gave BRICS the power to partner with the GCC, which in turn gave them the leverage to initiate this decolonization process from the US military. His actions, from the assassination of Qasem Soleimani to brokering deals, were foundational steps in this transition.

His expected reward for executing this plan? A nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize and large investments in a stable Middle East. Immediately after the "theatre" concluded, Pakistan officially put his name forward, allowing him to claim he "saved the world from nuclear war."

What Comes Next? Follow the Money.

The central theme is clear: the world stage is often a theatre designed to mask massive financial and power shifts occurring behind the curtain. The noise of war is used by agents of the deep state to distract the public while corporate powers renegotiate the global order and prop up their debt-based Ponzi scheme.

The outcome of this performance is a definitive move toward a multipolar world. The GCC, backed by the BRICS nations, is gaining regional control and decolonizing from US military influence. In its place, the Western financial-industrial complex is moving in to profit from the new era of investment and reconstruction. The military gets its profits from a newly energized NATO in Europe, while the financiers get their profits from a "peaceful" Middle East.

Call to Action

If you found this analysis insightful, I encourage you to watch the full, in-depth breakdown in the original BitcoinHardTalk episode to understand all the moving pieces.

Watch TLDR Ai Summary & Whiteboard Explainer Video

Peace,

Simon Dixon
Bitcoin OG | Investor | Geo-Political & Financial Analyst

Detailed Disclaimer

This Content and Methodology

This blog post, titled "The Play-by-Play Theatre of the Iran, Israel & US War | This Week in GeoPolitics (Part 3) | #BitcoinHardTalk Episode 87," is owned and published by Simon Dixon. This analysis and the accompanying text were written with AI assistance under Dixon’s supervision, synthesizing his live commentary on X Spaces, public sources, and extensive geofinancial insight.

The material presented herein constitutes educational commentary only and is based on a geopolitical and financial analysis methodology that prioritizes "following the financial flows instead of the fear-mongering media". The author’s objective is to reveal "what was really going on behind the scenes" and to provide insight into how the world "really works".

Views and Liability

The central conclusions—such as the assertion that the conflict was a "pre-scripted, meticulously choreographed piece of 'geopolitical theatre'" and the claim that "Israel Isn't in Control—It's a US Colony"—are presented as the author’s explicitly stated opinions and beliefs. While the analysis follows financial evidence to predict outcomes, the author acknowledges that he is "not privy to these meetings" and may get some specific details wrong.

The content provided should NOT be considered investment advice, financial advice, legal advice, or political guidance. The commentary is offered solely for informational purposes and to encourage critical thinking about global power dynamics.

Controversial Nature

Readers must be aware that the views expressed in this analysis are highly controversial and challenge entrenched narratives. This content runs counter to popular media noise and has led to the author being subjected to public abuse for debunking claims that "Israel rules the world". The analysis is intended to show conclusions that are often "the opposite of the bullshit that you're being sold".

Risk and Responsibility

The information contained within this article is based on the provided source material and must be verified by the reader. The author advocates for citizens to protect their wealth by owning assets, such as Bitcoin, as a defence against the inflationary effects of the "proof of weapons network". However, this should not be misconstrued as professional investment recommendations.

Simon Dixon and simondixon.com disclaim all liability for any reliance placed on the information contained within this geopolitical and financial analysis.