Why Would Israel Want To Assassinate Charlie Kirk & What Israel’s Qatar Strike Means | This Week In GeoPolitics (Part 3) | #BitcoinHardTalk Episode 98
Sep 24, 2025TL/DR: Not Got Time To Watch The Full Video? Watch the TL/DR AI Summary Here Or Click On Image Below 👇
I speculate that the assassination of Charlie Kirk could be a geopolitical tool utilized by the US Proof-of-Weapons (POW) Network to facilitate the controlled divorce from Israel. Kirk became a political liability after criticizing Israel and allegedly refusing a $150 million funding offer. His death was more useful to the network than his life, creating the manufactured rage necessary for the blame shift narrative.
This aligns with "Operation Qatar Strike," a preordained orchestration designed to make the US security guarantee look unreliable in the region. Regional consequences are proving the thesis: The UN officially declared genocide in Gaza, accelerating Israel's transition into an "economically strangled 'super-Sparta' reality". Regional powers (GCC, Iran, Pakistan) are rapidly normalizing and aligning against Israel. I believe the end game is the total vassalization of the Levant by regional hegemons.
Hey-Hey, Bitcoin Wealth Builders!
Welcome back to Part Three: This Week in Geopolitics. I’m tackling the massive overarching question everybody is talking about: Who killed Charlie Kirk? My goal is to follow the money and draw conclusions based on the strategic operations of the Proof-of-Weapons Network, rather than trusting the lies coming from the FBI and the mainstream media. I remind you that we will never know the decisive truth, much like the assassination of JFK, but the narrative is being weaponized regardless.
I believe two operations are happening simultaneously, both serving the same goal: "Operation Divorce and Blameshift".
Operation 1: The Charlie Kirk Assassination & The Divorce
I theorize that the US POW Network, specifically the military-industrial complex (MIC) deep state, may have organized the assassination of Charlie Kirk. This could be part of an operation to strategically switch narratives, making alignment with Israel unpopular and turning it into a toxic asset.
The Liability: Kirk, who started as Israel's top non-Jewish loyalist, became a threat after his ideological shift. He was a product of the Zionist ideology that weaponized Christian faith for military goals. His pushback included:
- Stating that Epstein was a Mossad agent.
- Lobbying Trump against the Iran War on behalf of Israel.
- Allegedly refusing a massive $150 million funding offer from Netanyahu, brokered by Bill Ackman.
- Allowing anti-Zionist voices to speak at his Turning Point USA event.
I argued that Kirk dead was as useful an asset as him alive. His death provided the necessary manufactured rage to push the blame shift, allowing the US to publicly distance itself from Israel.
Evidence of Orchestration: I highlighted several suspicious details pointing to potential orchestration:
- Netanyahu tweeted condolences within minutes.
- Israeli media was the first to confirm Kirk’s death.
- A private jet owned by a Chabad Lubavitch donor disabled location monitoring near the scene.
- Trump insiders reportedly dispute the official FBI story, claiming "outside forces" killed Kirk. The FBI’s releases have been inconsistent and used to push red herrings, creating a "merry-go-round of distraction".
Weaponizing the Narrative: I believe the POW network is using the fallout to build the framework for a technocracy. While publicly performing support for Israel (approving $650 million for missile defense), the network simultaneously advances measures that fuel civil unrest and undermine the US Constitution. This includes pushing to block the release of the Epstein files and supporting case law that enables the US to revoke passports of Israeli critics. This manufactured chaos justifies a more intense surveillance state and the removal of constitutional protections.
My suggestion for a next step is to analyze the inconsistent FBI releases and the contradictory media narratives being pushed by various influencers (like Candace Owen and Ben Shapiro) to understand how the POW network manages competing narratives during a controlled divorce.
Operation 2: The Qatar Strike and Regional Consolidation
I covered the simultaneous Israeli strike on Qatar, which I theorized was a preordained orchestration that Qatar agreed to. This strike, which followed earlier Iranian strikes on Qatar, served a strategic purpose.
The Goal: I believe the strike was designed to make the US security guarantee look unreliable in the region. This pressure forces regional players to hedge away from Israel and the US military model, allowing the POW network to replace "forever war" profits with financial diplomacy.
The Results (The Divorce in Action): The response from regional and global powers confirms the POW network’s shift:
- Isolation of the US/Israel: The US cast the sole veto against a UN Security Council resolution demanding a ceasefire and the release of all hostages, demonstrating complete isolation. Spain canceled a €700 million deal to acquire Israeli-designed rocket systems, and the EU suspended financial aid to Israel.
- Genocide Declaration: The UN officially concluded Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, pushing Israel into the category of a pariah state.
- Regional Alignment: Saudi Arabia and Iran normalization is progressing. Saudi Arabia and Pakistan signed a joint strategic defense agreement, aligning the GCC with a nuclear power and indirectly with the Chinese military-industrial complex.
- Vassalization: Netanyahu warned his people that Israel faces "growing global isolation and may be forced into an economically strangled 'super-Sparta' reality". The trend is clear: Israel is transitioning from a US colony to a GCC vassal, where regional hegemons will control its policy and economy.
I noted that Qatar and the US are nearing the finalization of a stronger defense cooperation agreement, proving that the theatrics of the strike were successful in negotiating new terms outside the old Israel proxy framework.
The Peace Conditions: I reiterated that peace in the Middle East is possible when three conditions are met, all of which are being accelerated by this divorce:
- Saudi Arabia and Iran normalize;
- There is a resolution to the Palestinian cause; and
- The US exits the region as a military antagonist.
My suggestion for a next step is to track the geopolitical news flow around the September 29th visit of Netanyahu to the White House, invited by Trump. I believe this event is designed to satisfy US Zionist hardliners while publicly advancing the narrative of the inevitable divorce and Israel's isolation.
Final Thoughts: Boycott the System
The POW network uses assassination, conflict, and financial tools to prop up the dollar-based debt Ponzi scheme. The only way to reclaim sovereignty is through peaceful resistance.
Reclaim your sovereignty by boycotting the system:
- Boycott the Fed with Bitcoin.
- Boycott BlackRock by holding your assets in self-custody.
- Boycott the banks by aiming to be debt-free.
- Boycott the global corporations by spending locally.
Choose a peaceful, decentralized monetary system. Don't trust, verify.
Prefer To Listen?
You can listen to BitcoinHardTalk Episode 98 right here on Simon Dixon’s website
Watch On YouTube
Why Would Israel Want To Assassinate Charlie Kirk? | This Week In GeoPolitics
Read Related Blogs
Disclaimer
This blog was generated with the assistance of AI and is based on the views, commentary, and live analysis delivered by Simon Dixon in Bitcoin HardTalk Episode 98. The purpose of this blog is to distill complex global developments—including the geopolitical theories regarding the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the structural shifts due to "Operation Blameshift," and the analysis of regional vassalization—into an accessible format for educational and informational purposes only.
The commentary included herein reflects personal theories and opinions based on following monetary flows, historical analysis, and public data available at the time of the episode. The central thesis regarding the Proof-of-Weapons Network, the alleged manipulation of events (such as the assassination of Charlie Kirk and the strike on Qatar), and the role of the Israeli government in geopolitical operations are presented for analytical discussion and should not be construed as established fact. I believe that the complete, decisive truth regarding such conspiracies is predicted to remain unknown and that the ambiguity serves the purpose of narrative control.
This content does not constitute financial, legal, tax, investment, or political advice. Bitcoin and other digital assets are volatile, high-risk instruments. Readers should perform their own due diligence and consult qualified professionals before making financial decisions. Nothing in this blog should be interpreted as a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any asset, nor does it suggest any guarantee of future performance or outcome.
By reading this blog, you acknowledge sole responsibility for any interpretation or action you take based on this content. Neither Simon Dixon nor any affiliated parties shall be held liable for financial loss, reputational damage, or decision-making based on the insights presented herein. For the complete and unfiltered version of Simon Dixon's analysis, readers are encouraged to watch the full BitcoinHardTalk Episode 98 livestream.
